Macron joins Trump in exasperating NATO allies this summit.
As this week’s NATO summit in London approaches, leaders are once again on tenterhooks about what President Donald Trump will do once he gets there. The main difference this year is that he’s not the only leader causing exasperation. Trump has railed against NATO as an organization that lets allies free-ride on U.S. defense spending since he was a candidate. He has also managed to cause some sort of drama or meltdown at every summit he has attended so far. NATO has done its best to placate the president ahead of the meeting, which starts Tuesday. Trump has taken credit for NATO countries taking on more of the NATO defense burden since he took office. NATO also announced last week that it was reducing the U.S. contribution to the organization’s central operating budget. Will this be enough to keep the president happy for three days in London? Almost certainly not. The summit presents a veritable minefield of potential conflicts. To start, former national security adviser John Bolton suggested in a private speech that Trump could withdraw from NATO if elected to a second term. This threat is likely to come up. Then there’s Turkey. Syria is not on the summit’s official agenda, but NATO member Turkey’s recent incursion into its neighbor will overshadow this week’s talks. Most European leaders condemned Turkey’s attack on the Syrian Kurds, in stark contrast to Trump, who greenlit the operation and spent the ensuing days veering between ambivalence and outright support. At previous summits, Trump has reportedly suggested that he thinks Recep Tayyip Erdogan is the only NATO leader doing things the “right way.” Given that the summit is in the U.K., it also seems very unlikely that Trump will be able to resist weighing in once again with his thoughts on next week’s British election, despite the clear wishes of his friend, Prime Minister Boris Johnson, that he keep his mouth shut. And then there’s impeachment. As he left the White House for the summit on Monday morning, Trump criticized House Democrats for holding impeaching hearings this week while he’s out of the country on “one of the most important journeys that we make as president”—which is not how this president usually talks about summit meetings. Given the importance that the alliance, with its roots in the Cold War, places on supporting Eastern European countries against potential Russian aggression, the revelations around Ukraine have only highlighted the degree to which Trump views that support as conditional and tied to his own political interests. If Trump doesn’t cause a scene in London this week, it may only be because French President Emmanuel Macron beats him to it. Macron’s recent criticism of NATO and the central assumptions underpinning Europe’s security alliances have been as biting as Trump’s—and much better informed. “What we are currently experiencing is the brain death of NATO,” Macron said in a wide-ranging interview to the Economist last month. Macron argues that Europe needs to rethink its defense posture in a world with an “American president who doesn’t share our idea of the European project.” To that end, he has recently been championing the European Intervention Initiative, a new defense coordination project that does not include the United States and is separate from NATO. Macron also argues that Turkey’s recent actions in Syria should raise questions about NATO’s all-important Article 5, which states that an attack on one member will be considered an attack on all. “If the Bashar al-Assad regime decides to retaliate against Turkey, will we commit ourselves under it?” he asks in the Economist interview. Even more controversially, he also argues that it’s time to question the alliance’s “unarticulated assumption … that the enemy is still Russia” and supports a rapprochement with Vladimir Putin’s Russia. In the interview, he seemed sympathetic to Russian concerns about NATO enlargement. The interview prompted rebukes from a number of European leaders, most notably Germany’s Angela Merkel who strongly defended the value of NATO and the trans-Atlantic alliance. The interview followed several other occasions where Macron has staked out positions at odds with the European consensus and with Merkel in particular. Macron has repeatedly argued, often single-handedly among EU leaders, against further extensions of the U.K.’s Brexit deadline. He suggests that the endless wrangling over Brexit is distracting from much more pressing European priorities and that the British should be held to their commitments. In October, Macron also blocked the beginning of EU membership talks for Albania and North Macedonia, arguing that the EU enlargement process needs reform. This was a major setback for North Macedonia in particular, which recently made the politically painful decision to change its name in order to assuage Greek concerns, specifically so it could begin membership talks. Critics argue that the EU shutting the door to these countries could endanger stability and democratization efforts in the western Balkans and give a diplomatic opening to Russia. EU Commission Chief Jean-Claude Juncker called it a “a major historic mistake.” In both the EU and NATO contexts, Macron has argued that in the age of Trump, Brexit, and Syria, Europe needs to radically rethink old assumptions about its geopolitical position—expansionist, closely tied to America, reflexively anti-Russian. This hasn’t gone over well with his fellow leaders, though that may have as much to do with the style of the messenger than the message itself. Referring to both the Economist interview and the Macedonia dispute, Merkel recently told Macron at a dinner, “I understand your desire for disruptive politics. But I’m tired of picking up the pieces. Over and over, I have to glue together the cups you have broken so that we can then sit down and have a cup of tea together.” According to the New York Times, Macron replied he couldn’t go to the meeting and simply “act like nothing has happened.” France may be a founding member of NATO, but Macron’s current stance is part of a long history of French tetchiness about the alliance dating back to President Charles de Gaulle’s decision to withdraw the country from NATO’s military command in 1966—at that time, France’s objection was that the U.S. was playing too strong a role, not too weak—a decision that wasn’t reversed until 2009. The French partial withdrawal was one of the most damaging crises in the alliance’s history. But NATO survived France’s hostility. It will probably survive the current U.S. administration’s as well. Whether it can survive the simultaneous hostility of both is a tougher question.Popular in News & Politics
-
上一篇
-
下一篇
- 最近发表
-
- 23 Peculiar Places of 2023
- 来珠海,到和美乡村过大年
- 6月起办税需先通过实名认证 过渡期到10月31日
- 去年青岛人均年工资58551元 你“拖后腿”了吗?
- Abrar Ahmed returns as Pakistan names squad for second Test against Bangladesh
- 灞变笢寤烘垚鍏ㄥ浗棣栦釜鍘垮煙缁忔祹鍥芥璐告槗渚垮埄鍖栨湇鍔′腑蹇僟涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- “点滴”汇聚力量 无偿献血共抗疫情
- 助力绿美广东!清远佛冈黄花村自发种下300棵油茶树
- GPU Mining is Dead, Where are my Cheap GPUs?
- 省药监局第二检查分局来雅检查药品生产企业复工等情况
- 随机阅读
-
- 多措并举优治理 绘就幸福新图景
- 我市法律服务行业全面复工营业
- 闈掑矝瀹炴柦鍒涗笟娴烽弗琛屽姩 姣忓勾琛ヨ创100涓ぇ瀛︾敓椤圭洰
- 我市部分景区景点有序开放迎客
- 共同推动雅安职工思想政治引领数智化发展工作做深做实
- 助力绿美广东!清远佛冈黄花村自发种下300棵油茶树
- 农行青岛市分行征信宣传活动异彩纷呈
- 海大与华高墨烯共建“新型碳材料联合实验室”
- 9 Festive Holiday Treats and Where to Find Them
- 酒店界的一股清流 青岛将在全市推广“丽天经验”
- 酒店界的一股清流 青岛将在全市推广“丽天经验”
- 青岛联通创新技术手段实现居民区4G深度覆盖
- [Exclusive] Samsung unsure of Suga's future as brand ambassador: source
- 山东高铁推出消费便民举措 高铁消费可以刷支付宝
- 青岛大学生跨境电商合伙人计划启动 出单近万
- 青岛企业加速“走出去” 境外投资过半为并购
- 'Black Myth: Wukong' PS5 review in progress: A potential masterpiece
- 大樱桃上网飞往全国 云山镇果农可增收9.5亿
- 青岛首批天使基金功成身退 撬动4亿资本效能惊人
- 微信又推出逆天功能!网友:一定要转给爸妈
- 搜索
-
- 友情链接
-