EU legal advisor backs UEFA over Super League
LUXEMBOURG: The European Court of Justice's top legal advisor said Thursday that football governing bodies UEFA and FIFA had acted within the law when they threatened to expel clubs or players who joined a proposed Super League. The opinion of Advocate General Athanasios Rantos is not binding on the court, which is examining a complaint from the company that planned to run the new league, but it will be influential and taken as a sign of the direction the case is taking. "EU competition rules do not prohibit FIFA, UEFA, their member federations or their national leagues from issuing threats of sanctions against clubs affiliated to those federations when those clubs participate in a project to set up a new competition," he wrote. The court's final decision is not expected until early next year. The position was immediately welcomed by FIFA and the Spanish La Liga as well as lobby groups representing European football clubs, leagues and supporters. FIFA said it was happy Rantos had said it could "approve any new football competitions", that he had said it could impose sanctions and it "had exclusive rights to market" its international competitions. FIFA also welcomed his recognition of "the special nature of sport." The Spanish La Liga also welcomed the news. "La Liga, along with other European leagues, will continue to fight for European institutions to legislate and provide legal protection for the current European model of soccer," said La Liga president Javier Tebas in a statement. Fan association Football Supporters Europe said: "Last year, twelve obscenely wealthy clubs tried to destroy European football by creating a closed breakaway league. "They failed because fans across the continent – including their own – stood in solidarity against their plans."
The European Club Association hailed Rantos' advice as "a clear rejection of the efforts of a few to undermine the foundations and historical heritage of European football for the many."
The attempt to set up an elite trans-European league in 2021, under the aegis of the European Super League Company (ESLC), initially attracted the support of some of the continent's biggest and richest clubs – but triggered a backlash from fans and governments.
The effort fell apart within 48 hours, but left behind bitterness and a key legal question.
The ESLC filed a complaint accusing UEFA, which regulates European football and organises the Champions League and Europa League, of "abusing its dominant position" in the market to squeeze out fair competition.
The eventual ruling will be keenly watched by teams and fans across Europe.
If the court follows its advisor's reasoning, the ESLC's challenge will fail.
"Whilst ESLC is free to set up its own independent football competition outside the UEFA and FIFA ecosystem, it cannot however, in parallel with the creation of such a competition, continue to participate in the football competitions organised by FIFA and UEFA without the prior authorisation of those federations," Rantos wrote.
A22 Sports Management, which says it was set up to sponsor and help bring about a Super League in Europe, responded with a press release.
"The Advocate General made clear that UEFA has a monopolistic position," it said, adding: "We believe the 15 judges of the Grand Chamber...will go substantially further and provide the opportunity for clubs to manage their own destiny in Europe."
European law generally protects commercial competition, but the advocate general found that the soccer governing bodies' threats "may be justified by legitimate objectives related to the specific nature of sport".
In the case of the short-lived super league initiative, this may be a moot point.
Initially it was supposed to create a competition for 12 clubs: Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, Tottenham, AC Milan, Inter Milan, Juventus, Atletico Madrid, Barcelona and Real Madrid.
Fellow giants Paris Saint-Germain and Bayern Munich refused from the start to take part and the English clubs quickly distanced themselves from the plan in the face of fan fury.
UEFA imposed light fines on the nine clubs that dropped out, extracting a committment they would not try again, but Real Madrid, Barcelona and Juventus face a disciplinary inquiry that has been put on hold pending the legal ruling.
- 最近发表
-
- CPUs Don't Matter For 4K Gaming... Wrong!
- 重达30斤,湛江金鲳海捕节头鱼拍出188888元!
- 我市公务员全员纳入工伤保险保障体系
- 致敬“三八节” 交行高新区支行赠礼暖人心
- Tesla issues recall for 9,100 Model X cars
- 渔约湛江最长情!“渔公子”倾情推介湛江金鲳鱼
- 2月CPI同比上涨5.2% 食品价格同比上涨21.9%
- 发挥特检技术优势 保障重大工程项目建设
- Expanded police surveillance will get us “broken windows” on steroids.
- 濡備綍涓庡崕鏅ㄥ畤绾︿細?鐢ㄤ竴缃愰潚宀涚函鐢熸妸浠栧甫鍥炲
- 随机阅读
-
- Best smart home deals this week
- 市作协第四次会员代表大会召开
- 闈掑矝娓?019骞村害涓氱哗锛氳惀鏀跺悓姣斿3.6%
- 青岛金家岭将再添金融地标
- 24 of the Oldest Trees in the World
- 结石堵塞致肾衰竭 及时清除摆脱透析
- “把耽误的时间抢回来”科思创聚合物(青岛)有限公司“四班轮岗”不间断赶订单
- 濡備綍涓庡崕鏅ㄥ畤绾︿細?鐢ㄤ竴缃愰潚宀涚函鐢熸妸浠栧甫鍥炲
- US Open 2024 livestream: How to watch US Open tennis for free
- 以身作则 乐于助人
- 双千兆再升级!山东联通带你打开奇妙的5Gⁿ 新世界
- 聚焦五育项目 抓牢德育教育
- 3D Game Rendering 101
- 聚焦五育项目 抓牢德育教育
- 杨汉春:必须摒弃非洲猪瘟与生猪产业共存的幻想,不根除将永无宁日
- 董家口港区原油码头二期工程复工建设
- Discover Secret Swimming Holes and Hidden History in Crystal River, Florida
- 应对挑战抢抓机遇 再造一个产业芦山
- 青岛西海岸新区中德生态园小学开展家校“接力式”发课本行动
- 应对挑战抢抓机遇 再造一个产业芦山
- 搜索
-
- 友情链接
-