Hospitals need to cancel elective procedures to flatten the coronavirus curve.
Hospitals that continue performing elective procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic are irresponsible and shortsighted. In Wuhan, one study showed that 41 percent of new infections were transmitted in the hospital—to previously hospitalized patients and health care workers. If we learn anything from colleagues around the world who are forced to ration medical care, it’s that we must act swiftly to minimize unnecessary exposure to our hospitals. Patients will die in this pandemic. So will doctors, nurses, and other health care workers. Cancellation of elective procedures is an important step to help flatten the coronavirus curve. As an anesthesiologist and medical ethicist working on the front lines of this pandemic, I’m keenly aware of the ethical dilemmas facing health care workers, like never seen in modern medicine. The COVID-19 pandemic will stress hospital resources to their breaking points. This demands thoughtful consideration about resource utilization, saving critical personnel, equipment, and protective gear for those who need them most. We cannot allow elective surgeries to use resources that should be saved for critically ill patients. It’s time to preserve as many hospital beds, intensive care beds, ventilators, and personal protective equipment as possible. Many hospitals run on very lean supply chains, choosing to maintain only a few days’ or weeks’ worth of some equipment, like N95 respirators. That means there may not be enough personal protective equipment to go around. Operating rooms are the economic engines of hospitals across the country, and canceling procedures will admittedly cause a massive financial impact on hospitals. Each year in the United States, more than 53 million elective surgeries and colonoscopies are performed, leading to $472 billion in outpatient revenue to health care systems. As a result, some hospital administrators may delay the decision to cancel elective cases, fearing the deep financial impacts this will have on the bottom line. Finances must, however, be a secondary concern. If we wait, it will cost significant human life.Popular in News & Politics
This piece was originally published on Just Security, an online forum for analysis of U.S. national security law and policy.
- 最近发表
-
- 热浪来袭 科学应对防中暑
- Pompeo heads to North Korea for meeting with Kim Jong
- How to connect Bluetooth headphones to a Windows PC
- 12 best and funniest tweets of the week
- What to expect when a tech bubble bursts
- 立足“造血”扶贫 开拓增收新路
- Ministry to inject W11.2tr into higher, lifelong education
- Diplomatic hurdles face possible papal visit
- CeeDee Lamb secures record
- 从鲜龙眼到桂圆肉,高州储良龙眼凭啥从夏天火到秋天?
- 随机阅读
-
- We Asked GPT Some Tech Questions, Can You Tell Which Answers Are Human?
- Apple redesigns its online store, makes it more like the iOS app
- Using a PlayStation 4 Controller with Your PC
- “拼多多杯”第二届科技小院大赛重庆开赛,滇桂渝3地各有1支队伍晋级决赛
- Prime exclusive deal: $50 off Govee floor lamp
- Man Utd 'considering response' to Ronaldo 'betrayal' claims
- Firefighters sue interior minister over Halloween crowd crush
- Slate News Quiz: coronavirus, North Korea, Libertarian Party.
- How to trademark your TikTok phrase and protect your brand
- ‘Stand with us’: One month after Itaewon disaster, bereaved families seek solidarity
- Yoon’s envoy says NK insult shows pressure is working
- Airbnb adds WiFi speed results to rental listings
- 广州市白云区供销联社携手6所院校15支队伍,加力提速推进“百千万工程”
- New catalyst rearranges carbon dioxide and water into ethanol fuel
- Voting rights activists march on D.C. as Bernice King calls out virtue signaling for MLK Day 2022
- Peloton is increasing its prices, blaming inflation
- 广东超一半的北运淡水鱼来自这里!全链发力打响“南海鱼”金字招牌
- ‘Stand with us’: One month after Itaewon disaster, bereaved families seek solidarity
- Two Koreas to create joint military committee
- 德庆贡柑再拓营销版图!为西藏拉萨献上“小心柑”
- 搜索
-
- 友情链接
-